Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lawrence R. Alberti, Cross-Appellants v. Johnny Klevenhagen, Cross-Appellees, 88-2570 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 88-2570 Visitors: 33
Filed: May 31, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 903 F.2d 352 Lawrence R. ALBERTI, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees Cross-Appellants, v. Johnny KLEVENHAGEN, et al., Defendants-Appellants Cross-Appellees. No. 88-2570. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. May 31, 1990. Roderick O. Lawrence and Lisa Rice, Houston, Tex., for defendants-appellants cross-appellees. Gerald M. Birnberg and Jim Oitzinger, Houston, Tex., for Alberti, et al. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, James DeAnda, Chief Judge.
More

903 F.2d 352

Lawrence R. ALBERTI, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees Cross-Appellants,
v.
Johnny KLEVENHAGEN, et al., Defendants-Appellants Cross-Appellees.

No. 88-2570.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

May 31, 1990.

Roderick O. Lawrence and Lisa Rice, Houston, Tex., for defendants-appellants cross-appellees.

Gerald M. Birnberg and Jim Oitzinger, Houston, Tex., for Alberti, et al.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, James DeAnda, Chief Judge.

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING

(Opinion March 21, 1990, 5th Cir., 896 F.2d 927)

Before LIVELY,1 JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

With one exception, we deny the petitions for rehearing filed in this case. In our original opinion, Alberti v. Klevenhagen, 896 F.2d 927 (5th Cir.1990), we reversed the district court's $5.00 enhancement of the hourly rate to compensate plaintiffs' attorneys for case undesirability. We now vacate that portion of the opinion and affirm the district court's case undesirability enhancement. We are now persuaded that the district court's finding that an enhancement for case undesirability was required to attract competent counsel to take on this undesirable prison conditions litigation was supported by the record. We find that support in testimony by plaintiffs' attorneys and an expert economist on how the local market treats undesirable cases. We defer action on Oitzinger and Birnberg's motion for fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this appeal until entry of judgment on remand.

1

Circuit Judge of the 6th Circuit, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer